Tag Archives: Section 232

Steel Prices in the United States at Ten-Year High

The impact of 25 percent tariffs on imports of steel into the United States has been significantly eroded by the domestic mill price increases. Clearly, this situation would not have been anticipated at the beginning of the initiative.

The MEPS North American Average Flat Products selling figure increased by 34 percent, since the start of the year. In Western Europe, the steel price recovery, in US dollar terms, was just 3.5 percent over the same period. In Asia, an upturn of 6.5 percent was recorded.

How can the authorities in the United States square this circle? It is clear that, on a cost basis, domestic steel users will be in a position to return to purchasing from outside the country. This was not the original plan when the Section 232 plan was devised.

The answer will rest with the domestic steel producers. Overseas suppliers are likely to maintain their current offer prices. It will require action from the local steelmakers. This would, almost certainly, require them to adopt a different strategy to the one currently in place.

Source: MEPS International Steel Review

People also read:  Trade War Speculation Unsettles Emerging Steel Markets

Divergent Stainless Steel Price Trends Derive From Section 232

Stainless steel markets throughout the world have responded differently to the United States’ announcement, at the beginning of March 2018, of 25 percent tariffs on steel imports and 10 percent tariffs on aluminium.

Uncertainty persisted as temporary exemptions were granted to supplies from selected countries, until the end of May. A quota arrangement was agreed with South Korea. On May 31, the United States confirmed that tariffs will be imposed on imports from its NAFTA associates, Canada and Mexico, as well as the European Union effective from June 1.

In response, the European Commission has launched a safeguard investigation, in an effort to thwart the redirection of steel supplies, previously destined for the US market, into the European Union. This, like the US Section 232 action, is likely to lead to the imposition of import quotas or tariffs.

While some suppliers in Europe and Asia attempted to maximise shipments to the US, in advance of the application of trade measures, the attitude of most buyers and sellers has been cautious. Exports to the United States have declined. Meanwhile, we have many reports of producers elsewhere making competitive price offers in markets that they have not previously explored.

This has resulted in divergent price trends in the different regions. In the light of reduced import tonnages and the impending introduction of tariffs on future shipments, US domestic suppliers have met little resistance to substantial price hikes, in their home market.

Producers in Europe and Asia, conversely, have struggled, in recent months, to raise selling values, by even enough to cover the rising cost of raw materials.

Between February and May, MEPS’ North American average price, for grade 304 cold rolled coil, increased by 15.5 percent. During the same period, the corresponding Asian average rose by just 1.6 percent, in US dollar equivalent terms, while the EU figure dropped by 2.4 percent.

Source: MEPS – Stainless Steel Review

Section 232 Action Creates Ripples Throughout Stainless Steel Markets

Divergent trends have emerged, in worldwide stainless steel markets, in the wake of the United States government’s Section 232 deliberations. Acting on the recommendations of the report arising from the investigation into the effect of foreign-produced steel on US national security, President Donald J. Trump announced a tariff of 25 percent, to be applied to all steel imports into the United States, effective from March 23.

American stainless steel producers and distributors alike acted swiftly, applying increases to their selling prices. While this can be seen as taking advantage of the rising cost of material from overseas competitors and a predicted tightness in the supply of stainless steel, it was hoped that this move would discourage panic buying and, to some extent, avert that shortage.

Agreements were soon made with many of the United States’ leading trade partners, granting them exemption from the immediate imposition of the Section 232 tariffs. However, in a number of instances, the action is merely delayed, pending further negotiations. Consequently, US customers and traders remain reluctant to place orders with suppliers from certain countries, for fear that tariffs could be re-imposed by the time material is delivered. In this environment, it should be possible for local sellers to maintain their elevated prices, in the near term.

In other regions, this development has raised the spectre of a glut of stainless steel, as some producers lose their current outlets in the United States. Market prices have weakened, accordingly.

In Europe, despite encouraging domestic sales volumes, in the early part of this year, and a perception of strong underlying demand, stainless steel flat product basis values slipped, in March. They could decline further, in April.

Producers in South Korea were unable to secure, in March, the increases that they thought were justified by earlier rises in raw material costs. LME nickel values are believed to have passed their peak, for the current cycle. Chinese stainless steel coil market prices have been sliding, in recent weeks.

Source: MEPS – Stainless Steel Review – March 2018 Issue

People also read: Further Uncertainty Created by Section 232 Exemptions

Rising Costs and Section 232 Drives US Stainless Steel Prices Upwards

Global stainless steel transaction values increased, in February, reflecting the rising cost of raw materials – in particular, nickel and ferromolybdenum. Buyers are, generally, optimistic about underlying demand but not sufficiently to agree to price hikes that represent more than the increase in the mills’ input expenditure.

Producers in the United States announced further discount cuts – or basis price rises – for flat products, to be effective from 1 March. In the light of the current supply/demand balance, it may be considered difficult for suppliers to justify this move, following other, recent increases. Indeed, end-users are already expressing their displeasure with the upward trend in transaction values.

Sellers, though, may be encouraged by the prospect of tariffs or quotas being applied to imported material, as a result of the recent Section 232 investigation. The report found that the United States’ government would be right to protect its domestic steel industry, on the grounds of national security. The U.S. President has been presented with a range of recommended actions, including tariffs or quotas to be applied to all, or a selected group of countries. He must decide, by 11 April 2018, which, if any, of these measures to implement.

Whilst it is not definitively clear that such measures would apply to any, or all, stainless steel products, the potential effects are already being seen. Buyers are reluctant to place orders on overseas suppliers – especially from the countries that may be subjected to the most severe restrictions – mindful that tariffs could be in place by the time this material arrived.

The implementation of these measures would lead to a realignment in international stainless steel movements. Producers in East Asia, in particular, would need to seek out new markets, to replace the tonnages currently sold to the United States. A number of European mills also make regular shipments, across the Atlantic Ocean.

Source: MEPS – Stainless Steel Review – February 2018 Issue